Business

Ministers Face Backlash Over AI Copyright Law Changes

Published February 28, 2025

The UK Technology Secretary has come under fire for supporting plans that would exempt AI developers from copyright laws. Critics argue that this move favors Big Tech over the creative industry, which is valued at £126 billion and employs 2.4 million people.

Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, responded to concerns from musicians and artists, stating he would not be swayed by either side of the debate. He emphasized his open-mindedness but reiterated his stance that creators should have to opt out if they do not want their work used by tech companies.

Many in the creative sector, including renowned figures like Sir Elton John and Simon Cowell, have urged Mr. Kyle to reconsider. They argue that the proposed changes could have disastrous effects on their livelihoods. Kyle dismissed these concerns, saying, "There are already copyright laws in place for your AI pals to get the very rights they want, by obtaining a license from each creator or from the societies or organizations representing them."

Baroness Kidron, a prominent opponent of the proposed changes, criticized the government for catering to Silicon Valley. She remarked that supporting lobbyists does not serve the national interest. Meanwhile, singer-songwriter Mike Batt urged Mr. Kyle to take a step back and reconsider his approach. He claimed that this issue requires common sense and reasoning, and he suggested a change in direction.

The controversy has also prompted statements from Tory culture spokesman Stuart Andrew, who pointed out that most of the creative sector believes the proposed laws are inadequate. Andrew noted that the law as it stands protects creative works automatically, but the new system would put the onus on creators to protect their works from being used without permission.

Currently, tech firms utilize various forms of creative content, such as news articles, books, films, and artworks, to develop their AI training models, which some argue should require compensation to the creators. If the proposals go through, experts warn it could undermine the entire creative industry.

Despite significant backlash, the government is moving forward with an AI consultation suggesting a legal change to allow tech platforms to use creative works unless creators explicitly opt out. Critics say this will unjustly burden artists and publishers with the responsibility of monitoring their work.

Peter Kyle has faced criticism for prioritizing discussions with tech companies while neglecting meetings with leaders in the creative field before articulating his preference for an opt-out system. His team has stated that conversations with cultural representatives have taken place.

AI, Copyright, Creatives